Conservative talk on the wane... populism on the rise?

The Los Angeles Times on Monday reports that conservative talk radio in California is steadily losing audience and advertising revenue.

Reporter Michael Finnegan offers some disturbing anecdotal evidence about the slow, inexorable slide of conservative talk radio in the Golden State. Some big name hosts that were at the top of their game five or six years ago are out of work, like Larry Elder in L.A., or stuck in lame time-slots, like Eric Hogue in Sacramento. Well, maybe this is a trend or maybe not.

I'll leave others to pick apart what Melanie Morgan's pay cut means. But I do know that Finnegan makes an enormous error describing KFI's John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou as "conservative." The L.A. afternoon drive team are not conservatives, nor are they Republicans. They are rabble-rousing "independent" populists who know a good ratings opportunity when they see it.
John and Ken: Pallid and nerdy does not a conservative talk show host make.John and Ken: Pallid and nerdy does not a conservative talk show host make.
It's funny how political independents almost always end up supporting liberal ends. It's even funnier to watch as disillusioned Republicans eagerly join the frenzy. John and Ken undoubtedly struck a nerve with their listeners. Some 15,000 people turned out at KFI's "Heads on a Stick" rally in Fullerton a couple of weeks ago. I listened on the radio as erstwhile Arnold Schwarzenegger fans gleefully smashed "Total Recall" DVDs with sledgehammers. My friend Bill Goodwin at FreedomPolitics captured the festivities on video.

But John and Ken's crusade to oust Republican state legislators who voted to place Proposition 1A on the May special election ballot is an eccentric exercise in political retribution. Prop. 1A is ostensibly a spending cap measure, but it's really a tax increase extension that would only slow the growth of spending, not cap or reduce outlays in any meaningful way. It's a bad measure, and I hope it loses. I hope a few Republicans get walloped at the polls for good measure, too.

But the radio hosts' own rationale for seeking to punish Republicans over Democrats -- who are, after all, the majority party in the state legislature -- is arguable at best. Republicans are especially deserving of voters' wrath, John and Ken say, because they pledged to hold the line on taxes and didn't. Instead, the feckless GOP caucus concocted a way to deliver the votes to pass a $13 billion tax increase while covering the political backsides of the members who voted in favor of the budget and then the ballot measure. They've played to death the audio of Assemblyman Anthony Adams, a High Desert Republican, essentially admitting as much. They've also singled out Assemblyman Jeff Miller, R-Corona, for his support of Prop. 1A and recently issued a "fatwa" against the freshman Republican.

Adams, Miller and their state Senate colleague, Abel Maldonado, are first-rate hacks and deserve everything they get. But it's worth pointing out that John and Ken are doing nothing at all to undermine the strength and credibility of the Democrats who pushed the $145 billion budget most zealously. They are not rallying their more than 600,000 L.A. listeners (see comments) to tell Democratic leaders "enough is enough" for pushing deeply regressive tax hikes in the middle of a recession.

It could be that John and Ken seek to elect two-thirds majorities in both houses of the legislature, which would eliminate any need for Republican votes to pass the budget or raise taxes. In doing so, the Democrats would no longer be able to blame Republican "obstructionism" for the ill-effects of policies that have led to a mass-exodus of California's middle class.

That could be, but I doubt that John and Ken have thought about it in those terms -- if at all. They happen to be right about the fecklessness of the California GOP, the cravenness of the Democrats, and the utter idiocy of Arnold Schwarzenegger. But that doesn't make them conservative. It just makes them shrewd.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.infinitemonkeysblog.com/?q=trackback/6292

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

John and Ken were shocked

John and Ken were shocked after Katrina to discover that in a natural disaster they may have to take care of their own families for 3 days. The idea that government may not be able to feed them for 3 days was far too much grown up responsibility. They most certainly are not conservative. Their philosophy, if it can be complimented as a philosophy, is that government should take care of them but not demand anything of them. I believe we conservatives call that "adolescence."

Re: John and Ken were shocked

I hadn't heard that, Antoinette, but I'm not surprised. I haven't listened to those guys regularly in years. When I do listen to talk radio in the afternoon, I usually listen to Hugh Hewitt. But Hugh made the mistake of going on vacation the week before last, so I "touched that dial" and heard bits and pieces of John and Ken's tirade against the apostate Republicans in the legislature. And I listened to quite a bit of their Fullerton rally in the car two Saturdays ago. They've tapped into some legitimate grievances out there, no doubt about it. But you're right: Adolescence is at the core of their "philosophy."

John and Ken

I find this hilarious. What a surprise! The LA Times — which covers conservatives as if they are a strange pigmy tribe recently discovered in a wild jungle somewhere — classifies John and Ken as "conservative." They opposed Gray Davis and supported Arnold in the recall. Must be conservative, then.

I can buy that advertising revenue is declining. It's declining everywhere in every industry. But their audience shrinking? Perhaps ... but what's that supposed to be a sign of? Conservative radio is on the wane? I'll believe that when I see it.

Rush Limbaugh's ratings have gone up — thanks in part to the White House campaign against him. Mark Levin's radio show is the fastest-growing in the country — having gone from nothing to 200 affiliates in just two years. Maybe fewer people are listening to talk radio in general because, being laid off, they no longer have a commute to drive. And many, many more (like me) love talk radio, but listen to it almost exclusively via podcast. Anyway, the MSM pulls out the "conservative radio is dying" story every few years — especially after a presidential election — and every pre-obit is way off.

My wife mentioned this story in the LA Times when she came home from work yesterday, without having seen it on Infinite Monkeys. She said that the estimation of John and Ken's audience excluded their listeners in Ventura County, San Diego Count and the Inland Empire — basically about half their audience. John and Ken, I understand, are No. 1 in their time slot ... in the second biggest radio market in the country. No way their audience is only 600,000. John and Ken say their audience is 1.1 million. It's probably fair to split the difference. It's no small thing to get about 15,000 people to show up in Fullerton on a Saturday afternoon — even if the LA Times can't be bothered to cover it.

I'll Take John & Ken Over the Times...

... if we're betting who's got more staying power.

And yes -- that *is* saying something awful, if I think a radio team can outlast a major metro paper from here on out.

J & K are independents; I can tell: I agree with their stances about half the time. Their opportunism, if you want to call it that, benefits by being grounded in sincere dislike of over-governance, and persons relying on government. Any one listening to them regularly over the past 4 or so years would see that over and over again.

According to the LA Times, this makes them conservative. Of course, to the LA Times, anything to the left of Castro is conservative. So there's that.

P.S. Our State is Dying...

... and I can posit that "conservative " radio is losing audience owing to Right Flight out of the state... that leaves California -- California, mind you; the Golden State -- to the likes of such people as would seriously consider electing Gavin Newsome to run the state.

D'Ja ever wonder what Massachusetts would look like, if blown up to ludicrous size? Except for even more broken and nannified? You won't have to wait long to find out.

And I'm afraid my family won't be able to vacate the state soon enough.

Very tragic, for those like me who are native sons.

.
"Don't confuse political savvy with competence or principles." -- RobbL, 2009

Don't give up the ship

remember, there was a moral to be gleaned from the parable of the football players who tried to make a swim for it.